Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Pre-Writing Experience

Looking back on my past writing instruction, I can recall two distinct recommendations from teachers regarding pre-writing.  The first was outlining, something which I never found useful given that if I didn't any idea what I was going to write, what the heck was I suppose to write in an outline?!  I found that these outlines are useful only at the step directly before writing, and not one second before; the outlines from my writing teachers never proved helpful.  This seems like something that the teacher had found useful in her past and was trying to force onto her students, not all of whom found it nearly as useful as she did.  The second example of pre-writing was brain-storming, a form which I found entirely more helpful.  The forms of brain-storming ranged from simple free writing to elaborate concept maps (the point and format of which I can't quite remember).   I found this method entirely more useful than trying to start with an outline.  Brainstorming was something that allowed the students to pour out all of their ideas and to be able to see where they lead. Though now that I think about it, the methods of brain storming taught by my teachers in the past seem more controlled than my methods of brainstorming that I use now, which generally include an entire white-board and several pages in a note book which, to the inexperienced eye, would seem to be written in code! 

Reflecting on these styles taught by my writing teachers, I have realized how personal the 'pre-writing' step is.  I haven't seen a method that works for everyone, and in fact, such a method might not even exist.  Regardless, I believe that it is important that students be allowed to exercise their own pre-writing processes (or lack thereof) if they are to develop into independent writers, and not the 5-paragraph-essay drones pumped out by the public school system.

Question regarding the Encomium of Helen:  Is rhetoric, or the creation of an argument, as simple as this? It seems that the argument would prove logically invalid due to the fact that, from my point of view, many alternatives could have been left out.  Is the problem not over simplified, and by that reasoning, the conclusion also over simplified?

2 comments:

  1. I think that the path itself is not the objective of persuasion in rhetoric. As long as the end goal is satisfied (ie people are persuaded)it does not matter whether all avenues have been explored. Although there are many ways to persuade a person (each of which is different and potentially better or worse than the last)it does not matter which way is used as long as they are ultimately persuaded. This is because we as humans are only allowed one shot at this goal once a work or speech has been made. Tweaking and tuning up to a certain point is key; however, once our speech is out it is not open for reform.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, Brady, I'm not totally buying the argument either. But I would probably bow down to 'ol Gorgeous Gorgias in a verbal argument. I definitely saw a pretty good representation of persuasion in there. The other things that we can't really tell - like the memory and delivery aspects. The guy could have been remarkable at delivery. Certainly his arrangement was solid. I think it's a lot like selling the Brooklyn Bridge. His argument strains the limits of what is reasonable - on purpose.

    ReplyDelete